SimGerm 1.0

User Tests

Findings

Once accepted, the "AOL IM Message screen display" was very rapid. While watching the activity in the main screen, I wasn't able to keep up with the messages that prompted below. Took several times to go back and read them.

- Consultant

1st Prototype (LDT)

  • The animations were too fast.
  • No context.
  • Pathogen should be more noticeable.
  • A lot to read in the Message window.
  • Did not know what to do.

2nd Prototype (High School Students, Consultants, and LDT Faculty)

  • The animations were too fast.
  • Agent was confusing.
  • Timer was annoying.
  • The cells should come out of the cell button.
  • Hard to read the messages and keeping an eye on the "playing field".
  • People using Macs had a hard time opening the web file.

3rd Prototype (Content Experts)

  • There were some content discrepancies, for example, lysosome was not accurately portrayed.
  • It (SimGerm 1.0) is very beneficial in the sense that it gives you that information and by choosing that it reinforces that. I know that the first thing that comes in now is the macrophage and not the Helper T.

    - High School Student

  • Provide more definitions (e.g. interleukin 1 and 2).
  • Clarify/reword some text descriptions.

Assessment

  • A formal assessment is scheduled for next week.
  • The plan is to have 9 people divided into groups of 3.
  • The first group will read a page of text on CD4/CD8 and take a test.
  • The second group will go through the simulation and take a test.
  • The last group will read the page of text, go through the simulation, and take a test.
  • Hypothesis: The group reading the text will perform better than the group going through the simulation; however, the group reading the text and going through the simulation will perform the best.

Please email John Wong with comments or visit his homepage.